Stanley Saitowitz (March 7, 2001)

Coy Howard introduces Stanley Saitowitz

Saitowitz begins his lecture with an explanation of San Francisco, its landscape, diversity, history and the relationship of these to his work. He continues with a presentation of residential projects throughout Northern California. He views these projects as lenses which bring the site and its specific qualities into focus. His more recent residential works explore a “bar house” parti, in which the site is occupied with minimal divisions.

Saitowitz proceeds with his lecture, discussing several urban projects through which he has attempted to challenge conservative decision-making in the San Francisco zoning office. He presents a building which took advantage of code allowing for sectional inclusion of outdoor space in the Floor Area Ratio in addition to integrating a structural type which allows for greater programmatic flexibility. He goes on to show his work on several lager-scale urban complexes which integrate post-tensioned structural members and describes continued navigating around zoning roadblocks.

Saitowitz describes a park in Indiana which integrates elements derived from site and program requirements. The original attempt was to draw the city into the park, but as the park became a popular primary destination the project was expanded in order to draw park-goers into the city. He goes on to present a continuous yet programmatically and organizationally modulating light/bench/wall system along the Embarcadero in San Francisco. The project’s unforseen appeal to skateboarders lead to a skatepark commission in Kentucky. This park utilizes continuous surface movement which integrates interior and exterior spaces. The park provides a link to the surrounding modes of movement as skaters flow above internal spaces at the level of an adjacent highway.

Saitowitz concludes his lecture with a presentation of a synagogue and ceremonial objects and his New England Holocaust Memorial. Saitowitz reads a text which explains his intention to materialize a connection between the memorial and Boston’s Freedom Trail. He concludes describing the combination of memories and materials in the project.

source

Save This Post
ClosePlease login