Speculative research for a public space and forum, conducted at MIT 2012
This thesis articulates the representation of the last democratic space in America, post 9-11, as a critique based proposal that challenges our current and future negotiations with power in the built environment. Recognizing the challenge of a formal intervention upon a contradictory site, the National Mall will serve as the stage for testing a democratic space that communicates the asymmetrical relationships of public’s dialogue with governance in ‘public’ spaces.
While the Mall cannot be upheld as an egalitarian field, objects however can substantiate or infuse a democratic field within. This thesis justifies a form necessary to represent such a space, investigating compromised symbols that can be appropriated and redefined to provide functions and representation of conditions the National Mall distorts. The proposal infuses within the program responses to all major impositions of public spaces as a method of exposing the unstable conditions of democratic values residing on comprised fields. The purpose is not to render an ideal democratic space, but an independently operating machinelike space that highlights the context’s incongruous relationships.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Architecture + Urbanism 2012
Alexander D’Hooghe, MAUD, PhD
Associate Professor of Architecture and Urbanism
Arindam Dutta, PhD
Associate Professor of the History of Architecture
Julian Beinart, MCP, MArch
Professor of Architecture
Recognizable Classical Symbols and Orders are appropriated and redefined as they no longer represent their original intent as democratic institutions. These formal moves then offer a new meaning, to provide functions and representation of conditions the National Mall distorts. A major component in redefining these symbols is taking the most recognizable and repeated facade of governance, and having each abstraction, with classical order and its meaning in mind, serving as a critique of current power relations.
The body of the machine from a distance communicates a formal critique residing on a filed that leverages monumental forms and long distances as a display of power. The large field is expansive but the form operates within that field, residing in opposition to the undemocratic conditions, offering just enough abstraction appropriate for the scale of the field and its monuments. A closer view reveals of its difference through use of materials, details and construction.
The intent of the proposal is not focused on rendering an ideal democratic space, but one that questions public’s evolving dialogue with governance and power in open spaces while exposing their asymmetrical relationships. The management and use of the building is focused on responding to those conditions, while creatively subverting and leveraging restrictions imposed by codes and regulations that defy democratic values.
The machine includes certain functions that are resilient overtime and necessary for various uses of the space, such as assembly halls and open meeting spaces. The building is also equipped with programs and functions such as plumbing for restrooms and kitchen, storage, structure to pitch cover and elevators.
Source: https://www.behance.net/gallery/4618417/Absurd-Machine-Project-on-the-National-Mall by https://www.behance.net/amna-ansari is licensed under cc by-nc-nd (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en_US)